|
Visual Communications
P.N. Menon, a painter, with the active participation of scenarist
M.T. Vasudevan Nair and cameraman Mankada Ravi Varma, made a remarkable
film, Olavum Teeravum in 1970. Reminiscent of the Italian neo-realist
films in its stark realism, the film told with immense visual
appeal the story of an innocent Muslim girl of Malabar. That was
also the first authentic statement of the way of life of Malabar
Muslims. It was perfect in its accuracy of dialect, choice of
location and art direction. M.T. Vasudevan Nair was sure of his
milieu. But the film's reluctance to part with conventions like
songs and melodrama made it miss the mark of excellence. Olavum
Teeravum serves as an important link to the new decade when Malayalam
cinema progressed from verbal to visual communication methods.
In the mid sixties efforts were on to create conditions conducive
to the survival of artistic cinema in Kerala. A group of film
enthusiasts had already formed a film society, Chitralekha, in
Tiruvananthapuram, a trend setter in the state. It conducted seminars
and discussion on films apart from screening international classics.
It encouraged the formation of other film societies throughout
the state. As an off-shoot of this society came the Chitralekha
Film Co-operative Society, the first of its kind in the country
formed by a group of trained technicians with the intention of
making artistic films. After a period of practice through documentary
film-making, the co-operative attempted their first feature, Swayamvaram
in 1972 with Kulathoor Bhaskaran Nair as executive producer and
Adoor Gopalakrishnan as director. Technically superb, the film
dispensed with the cliches of traditional cinema particularly
songs till then considered as essential ingredient in feature
film. Although built on a weak narrative, the film was much ahead
of the Malayalam film of the time in its cinematic qualities and
won four national awards including that of best film. It launched
a major film maker in Malayalam. The next year M.T. Vasudevan
Nair, who had been writing screenplays for many a directors, came
up with his own directional venture, Nirmalyam. M.T was hesitant
to shed all the existing conventions but all the same produced
a brilliant first work. Although still coming to grips with the
medium, he was sure of his characters and their relationships.
Much of his pre-occupation with family and societal relationships
found earlier in his screenplay was evident here too. Nirmalyam
brought the President's best film award to Kerala for the second
consecutive year.
In 1974 well-known cartoonist G. Aravindan, who had established
himself as the most intellectual cartoonist in Malayalam with
his work 'Small men and the big world' in Mathrubhoomi weekly,
made his first film Utharayanam. Aravindan had no formal training
in film making although he was well exposed to other visual arts.
He had also got exposure to international cinema through the film
societies. Aravindan demonstrated an extraordinary sense of visual
expression and composition in his very first attempt. He was greatly
aided by scenarist Thikkodiyan, art director Namboodiri and cameraman
Mankada Ravi Varma. The film fetched a national award comemorating
the silver jubilee of Indian independence.
John Abraham, the `enfant terrible' of Malayalam cinema, who set
himself the untouched path of subversive cinema in his first Tamil
film, Agraharathile Kazhuthai, continued in the same vein in his
Malayalam films. Abraham could be credited with demystifying cinema's
long evolved conventions and he succeeded really well in blending
the theme and form with wry humour. His unexpected demise in 1987
caused a set-back to the kind of film-making that John propounded.
A number of promising newcomers made their first features in the
seventies and eighties who include Azad, K.G. George, K.R. Mohanan,
G.S. Panicker, V.R.Gopinath, K.N. Sasidharan and Shaji N. Karun,
all alumni of the Film and Television Institute of India, Pune
and others like Madhu, Bharathan, K.P. Kumaran, P.A. Backer, C.
Radhakrishnan, Padmarajan, Mankada Ravi Varma, Lenin Rajendran,
Ravindran, Rajeev Nath and Pavithran.
During the last two decades, Adoor Gopalakrishnan and Aravindan
consolidated their positions in not only Malayalam cinema but
in Indian cinema as well. Adoor made six significant films, Swayamvaram,
Kotiyettam, Elippathayam, Mukhamukham, Anantharam and Mathilukal.
Aravindan directed Utharayanam, Kanchana Sita, Thampu, Kummatty,
Esthappan, Pokkuveyil, Chidambaram, Oridathu, Unny and Marattam.
Most of these films won laurels from India and abroad and merited
screenings at International film festivals.
Theme and Form of Traditional Cinema
Right from the early days, the traditional Malayalam cinema had
different genres like socials (Hindu, Muslim and Christian), historicals,
wild life films, comedies, political types, crime thrillers, musicals,
docu-dramas, fantasies and so on, but the most favoured one was
socials. The release of socials particularly Christian and Muslim
ones were timed to religious festivals like X-mas and Bakrid and
some of them like Kuttikkuppayam proved all time hits. These socials,
meant to appeal different communities, were made at regular intervals.
The studio-owning producers of Udaya and Neela were very adept
at churning out these different genres at regular intervals.
Sometimes there would be simultaneous release of devotional/mythological
and other films with identical theme produced by different studios.
The same sets and properties were put to effective use for different
films. No matter what the genre is, the formula reigned supreme
and for that reason the attributes of a genre was not clearly
discernible in these films. Many of these films had only the semblance
of a genre. There would be songs and sentiments in Vadakkanpattu
_ based action films like Unniarcha (with twenty three songs!)
and even in wild life films. Formula elements would be found in
political films and comic scenes in devotionals. Attention to
pace seemed to be absent due to compulsions of including comic
scenes, songs and dance numbers, sub-plots and dramas. Song scenes
were considered a must till the seventies and the average number
of songs in a film ranged from a dozen in the fifties to about
half of it in the seventies. In fact the very first sound film
Balan had twenty three songs; probably T.R. Sundaram took the
cue from the Tamil and Hindi films of the time. Historical films
paid very little attention to period recreation and behaviour
patterns of the time. Similarly dialects of different regions
were conveniently ignored except for comic effects. The written
style of the Tiruvitamkur region was the most acceptable form
of language so that the widest cross section of people understood
a film. Also, most of the early script writers were from the south.
In social films, the milieu was not properly established. These
two factors sometimes made jarring note in films like Kandam Becha
Kottu (a muslim social supposedly taking place in the Kozhikode
region) and Unniarcha based on the legends of north Malabar. In
the sixties, a number of films dealing with the labour movements
were made absorbing the political ferment of the time.
Late seventies witnessed an emphazis on sex in Malayalam film.
Sex began to be treated in a more open way which encouraged distributors
to promote such films outside the state as soft-porn films. The
presentation of every day life and its problems itself without
any new insight or psycho-social analysis became the goal of many
film makers. The audience also seemed content with such banality,
judging from the popularity of such films. Sex was now treated
indirectly more at a subliminal level in many of these films with
a realistic exterior. The eighties saw a boom in pulp literature
in the state and films made out of serialized stories of these
journals found a ready market. A number of such adaptations set
in the middle class families which cleverly mixed melo-drama and
violence on the home front succeeded well at the box office. Such
films had a pronounced sexist bias and gender use became offensive
to women. The money accumulated in private investment companies
which sprouted along the length and breadth of the state, then
began to be diverted for film-making of this nature. Monopolistic
tendencies began to be felt in production and distribution and
with huge investment without any regard to the returns made the
commercial viability of an average film at stake. On the other
side of the commercial spectrum, film makers like I.V. Sasi and
Hariharan who were making sex and violence-oriented films in the
seventies, changed their course by making family dramas based
on screenplays by M.T. Vasudevan Nair and Padmarajan. This ensured
commercial success of a film. Both were prolific in their output.
Films based on their screenplays maintain a certain standard well
above that of the commercial productions in the rest of the country.
Although a sizeable majority of popular film dealt with predictable
themes, a few of them explored alternative subjects like tribal
life, pollution, Gulf migration, performing arts, biography, women's
issues and film-making itself.
|